Bir kadının bilincinin yerinde olmadığı anlarda çekilen ve paylaşılan görüntülerin "fantezi" veya "özel hayat" değil, nitelikli cinsel saldırı olduğu toplum ve hukuk nezdinde kabul gördü.
Action steps:
Searching for or viewing such footage contributes to the ongoing victimization of the person involved. gamze ozcelik gokhan demirkol videosu
In addition to the primary sexual assault trial, a separate legal battle was fought regarding the digital distribution of the video under privacy laws.
If you or someone you know has been affected by the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, helpful resources include: If you or someone you know has been
: The case centered around a video recording of the assault. While Demirkol initially claimed the act was consensual and both parties agreed to the filming, forensic evidence and a 7-member expert panel from the Council of Forensic Medicine concluded that Özçelik was unconscious or under the heavy influence of drugs during the recording.
Şikayetin ardından başlatılan soruşturma kapsamında eski basketbolcu Gökhan Demirkol tutuklu yargılanmak üzere cezaevine gönderilmiştir. İlk başlarda suçlamaları reddeden Demirkol, daha sonra Bianet haber arşivlerinde de yer alan duruşma tutanaklarına göre görüntüleri kendisinin cep telefonuyla çektiğini itiraf etmiştir. İlk başlarda suçlamaları reddeden Demirkol
The legacy of this case remains deeply embedded in Turkish legal history, acting as a crucial milestone that forced courts to update and enforce stringent parameters against digital sexual violence and privacy exploitation. If you need further details on this topic, please
After several appeals and retrials, Demirkol was sentenced to over 5 years in prison for sexual assault.
The core of the matter dates back to the summer of 2004.
In 2013, Demirkol was sentenced to over five years in prison for qualified sexual assault.
