1 Sek 1142 Apj 1987 Fix

: Failing to provide this information when requested is itself an offense. Under the Act, if the requested information is not supplied, the person may be liable to a fine or imprisonment. Key Takeaways for Vehicle Owners

The legal reference (frequently transcribed from a composite legal citation string like "1987 SCALE (1) 1142") represents a pivotal cross-border legal intersection. It ties back directly to landmark cases authored by eminent jurists like Supreme Court of India Justice A.P. Sen ("APJ"), while frequently intersecting in regional databases with statutory frameworks such as Seksyen 42 of the Malaysian Road Transport Act 1987 (Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987).

Khargram Panchayat Samity & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Ors. , decided on April 23, 1987. The citation can be broken down as follows: 1987 SCALE (1) 1142

In this specific legal challenge:

: The doctrine of "sufficient cause" for delay should be applied in a rational, common-sense, and pragmatic manner rather than a pedantic one. No Benefit to Delay

: A strict ban from holding a driving license for a period of 10 years . The Rule for Probationary Drivers (P-Plate)

The citation likely refers to a judgment from the Andhra Pradesh Law Journal (APLJ) . In legal research databases, "SEK" is a common shorthand or scanning artifact for "SCC" (Supreme Court Cases) or specific local journal abbreviations. Based on the context of landmark 1987 rulings often cited in this format, it specifically pertains to early medical negligence and professional liability precedents in Andhra Pradesh. 1 sek 1142 apj 1987

This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.

Imprisonment up to 15 years; fines up to RM100,000; 10-year license ban. Enforcement and the "1142" Context

Below is a draft report summarizing the legal significance of the 1987 rulings that shaped these principles. : Failing to provide this information when requested

used in the Mst. Katiji case or a different specific area of law?

The State does not have the absolute right to pardon a murderer; that right belongs primarily to the legal heirs of the deceased Provisions that did not allow for compromise (Sulh) or payment of compensation (